July 17, 2026

Europe May Finally Charge International Flights for Emissions — U.S. and China Get a Pass

0
Europe May Finally Charge International Flights for Emissions — U.S. and China Get a Pass



Europe May Finally Charge International Flights for Emissions — U.S. and China Get a Pass

Key Points

  • The EU ETS overhaul extends carbon permits to international flights for the first time and pulls in private/business jets, but exempts flights over 5,000 km — sparing most U.S. and China routes and prompting criticism that the highest-emitting long-haul flights escape pricing.
  • The airline industry (IATA) and international partners strongly oppose the plan, warning of retaliation, extraterritoriality conflicts, and lost competitiveness, and instead back the UN’s voluntary CORSIA scheme — which the Commission itself deemed insufficient, keeping full coverage on the table for a 2032 reassessment.
  • Passenger cost impacts are projected to be modest (~€10 Paris–Madrid, ~€31 Paris–Istanbul), and expanded SAF support tied to long-term offtake agreements is the one measure with broad industry backing, though SAF supply remains limited by feedstock constraints.

Summary

The European Commission has proposed a major overhaul of its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) that, for the first time, would extend carbon pricing to international flights departing from Europe — but with a significant carve-out exempting flights longer than 5,000 km, which covers most routes to the U.S. and China. Private and business jets, previously outside the system, would now be pulled in. Advocacy groups such as Transport & Environment call the plan “pragmatic,” estimating only modest ticket price increases (e.g., ~€10 for Paris–Madrid, ~€31 for Paris–Istanbul), while criticizing the exclusion of the longest, highest-emitting flights. The airline industry, led by IATA’s Willie Walsh, and international partners including the U.S. and China strongly oppose the move, warning of retaliation, extraterritoriality disputes, and reduced European competitiveness, and instead favor the UN’s voluntary CORSIA offsetting scheme. However, the Commission’s own assessment found CORSIA insufficient as an alternative, leaving the door open to reconsider full international coverage if CORSIA fails to deliver by its 2032 review. One area of common ground is expanded support for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), with free permits extended and tied to long-term offtake agreements to boost investor certainty — though SAF supply remains constrained by limited biomass feedstock.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *